Vishy Anand still number 1
FIDE have published the latest official rating list and despite some early misleading reports from FIDE, the Aerosvit tournament was deemed (correctly, according to the rules) to be too late for the results to be included this time. This means that Magnus Carlsen (pictured) is NOT the world's number 2, but only number 6. Still, not bad for a 17-year old!
The unofficial 'live' rating list is found here.
The official top 100 rated players are:
and the top 100 women players are below. Notable names for Chess.com include members Yelena Dembo at 43 and Rusudan Goletiani at 97.
yeah, it should be updated every tournament, it`s sooo easy to do...
I agree with Davy J123.
Apparently, in the past, tournaments have been included in the list that finished one week after the deadline. However, in this case did not include an event that finished only maybe 2-3 days after the deadline. I think they didn't include it because it was not a Fide event, I think I read that somewhere.
Alot of people favour that commonsense should prevail over deadlines. Also, I don't think it would have been a HUGE amount of work to add the tournament.
Somebody that knows something about data inputing and list compiling please step in and finish my moan for me..........thanks :)
@ knightking :
The deadline feels a bit early, but on the other hand it's quite a lot of tournaments to be included in it, as well as hundreds of thousands players to be taken into account before the calculations are done. They have to draw the line somewhere. Hans Arild Runde is monitoring fewer than 50 players for his excellent live list, though I don't know the exact number.
Carlsen might possibly benefit from this "rating lag" however, as his rating changes will be counted from 2775, rather than 2791.
The most notable case where FIDE counted a too-late tournament for the list was Linares, which meant Anand securing first place on the rating list but this is not standard procedure at all. The protests got too large for them to do otherwise then. This is by no means a standard procedure, just an exceptional case.
What's the reason for the deadline anyway? It's not like it takes a big effort to calculate the ratings. Isn't that live-site maintained by some random chess fan? Couldn't a huge organization like FIDE do the same?...
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.
Share some chess news with the community!
Share some chess news