7 Misconceptions about "Chess Players"

Submitted by erik on Wed, 08/22/2007 at 10:54pm.

When somebody outside of the chess world hears "He/she's a chess player", there are certain pre-programmed misconceptions that automatically fill the mind. While some of these ideas may be based on legitimate stereotypes supported by the broader chess community, most of them are are generalizations extracted from a few prominent figures and then applied to all players, for better or for worse.

Here are a few of strongest stereotypes that are just not true:

 

#1 Chess players are smarter

People like to say that chess players are smarter than the average Joe. The truth is, the average chess player is just the average regular person who happens to like chess. And while it has been shown that chess can improve the IQ somewhat, there are contrasting studies that show that chess players ARE smarter... but only when it comes to chess. Knowledge inside the game is not necessarily transferable outside of the game. The other problem with this stereotype is that there are lots of kinds of smart: analytical, mathematical, creative, visionary, street-smart, social intelligence, etc. And when you shake up the bag of collective chess players, your average chess player is, again, an average person who likes chess.

 

#2 Chess players are less socially adept

I have to be honest. I didn't always believe this was a false stereotype. My first few introductions to chess were awkward. There was the guy who refused to shake hands because of germs. There was the guy who screamed at me because I asked him why he used an analog clock. And then there was the guy who didn't shower - EVER. I've seen this behavior again and again and again at tournaments and clubs. But then one day it hit me - I'm only seeing a tiny sliver of chess players represented. There are more than 600 million people who know how to play chess. I was seeing just the handful that are not too socially busy to be somewhere else aside from chess club on Friday night. And of those, I was focused in on the more eccentric ones just because they are the most interesting. There are just as many examples of amazingly social and charasmatic individuals as there are of oddballs - take Josh Waitzkin, Yasser Seirawan, and Judit Polgar as great examples. I've since met thousands of players at dozens of events, and even more since I launched Chess.com, and it confirms once again that chess players are just a representation of the average population, except that they happen to have discovered the joys of chess. 

 

#3 Chess players must have amazing memory skills

Sure, we've all heard the phenomenal stories of the Grandmaster who can play 30 simultaneous games blindfolded and remember the positions in all of them. And yes, that is impressive. But the truth is that chess players do not have superior memorization skills, and it doesn't take superior memory skills to be a great chess player. Chess players are just tremendously familiar with chunks of pieces, known positions, familiar pawn structures, etc. This quote says it well:

"Remembering fifteen common English words would be no astonishing feat for an English person; it would be for someone who was not acquainted with the language. But his admiration is misplaced; he thinks that the chessplayer is remembering an enormous string of random patterns, for that is how the game appears to him, but in fact the chessplayer is merely speaking in the language of chess, a language with which he is familiar and whose patterns he has seen many times and knows by heart." For more, click here.

In fact, another study has shown that while chess masters ARE much better at memorizing chess positions that occur in natural games, they are no better off than non-chess players are memorizing board positions where the pieces are placed randomly. (More here.)

 

#4 Chess players are old, white, euro-caucasian, men 

We've all heard this stereotype, and Pixar didn't help any with their short film called Geri's game. But it isn't even CLOSE to true. First off, chess players are of all ages, from 7-year-old scholastic geniuses to middle-aged players to the senile. Second, chess is huge in India, the Philipines, South America, and growing in China and Africa. Third, more and more women are joining the game. Just click here for a view of some non-white women of all ages playing chess!

 

#5 Chess players are poor sports when they lose

Though the recent world championship may circumstantially support this claim, chess players are no worse than anyone else in competitive gaming or sports. In fact, I would argue that chess players display greater sportsmanship than others because most smart chess players know that with a loss usually comes learning, and most chess players love learning the game more than they love winning the game. That said, the next time your opponent throws a pawn in your eye don't blame me for not warning you.

 

#6 Chess players are not athletic

Try telling that to the guys in the picture who are competing for the World Championship Chess Boxing Title! Once again, chess appeals to athletes and non-athletes alike. If you look at a random sample of members on Chess.com you will find a lot of profiles that mention other sports, hobbies, and athletic interests. It is true that few grandmasters are top athletes, but that is a function of dedication, not ability. That would be like saying that athletes are not intelligent. It's not true, it is just a matter of prioritization. Another argument is that chess IS a sport, but I won't go there....

Finally, to read about more professional athletes who love chess click here.  

 

#7 Chess players are nerdy and unsexy

Perhaps the biggest misconception can be wrapped up in the notion that chess players are nerds. And while your particular high school chess club may skew your view, chess players come in all varieties. Take Maria Manakova (featured in the picture to the right). She is a WGM (Woman Grandmaster) who not only has top moves on the chessboard, but also... I'll stop there. Sure, she is the most extreme counter-example we have to the "nerd" fallacy, but again, chess players come from all walks of life. 

 

Next time you hear someone described as a "chess player", I hope you will be a little more open-minded about who that person might actually be. Sure, they might be the pocket-protecting fifty year old man who carries anti-bacterial handwash everywhere he goes (that will be me in 20 years Frown), but she might also be an beautiful track star from India or something. You never know!

 

» more Editorials
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by Hugh_T_Patterson - 36 days ago
San Francisco, CA United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 788

And here I thought I was the website's official village idiot. Yeah man, "Say it loud, I'm nerdy, I'm proud." Or, "get on the scene, like a chess machine." Or who could forget that lost James Brown classic, "It's a pawns, pawns, pawns world." Ayyone for "Get on the Rook foot?" Thank you very much, I'll be here all week!

by Lord-Svenstikov - 15 months ago
Worcester United Kingdom
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 675
I consider myself outside many chess stereotypes also. I turn up to chess tournaments in my heavy goth gear (studs, black longcoat... you get the idea).
by Royd - 15 months ago
Philippines Philippines
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 107

it differs in every one of us

 

by Hugh_T_Patterson - 15 months ago
San Francisco, CA United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 788

I love when people come up to me at shows and start talking about what they think is cool, and worse, what they think I think is cool. At this point I try to get them into a conversation about chess. Why? Because I can tell in an instant just how full of BS the person is and what just how really cool they are (really cool people are proud of their interests and don't care what other people think about those interests. They are their own persons). So I bring up chess with a line like "So how those people that play chess, what do you think about the game man?" Here are some typical responses:

"Oh man, thats a game for the nerd cult. I mean don't those people ever get tired sitting in front of the computer screen? They could try a little fresh air." T

That first one came from a guy that lives on myspace. What a dork. Here's another one:

"Isn't that a game for old men in the park?"

This from a woman who couldn't string together a thought if her life depended on it. My favorite:

"Isn't that the game Mr. Spock played on Star Trek? Who could possibly find any interest in a game that's an over glorified version of checkers?"

This from a guy who is so worried about the way he looks it takes him an hour to  get dressed when going out to buy toilet paper from the corner store.

At some point I get so upset that I tell them that I live for chess and have the same love for it that I have for my band. I then give them a list of their favorite bands and who in that band plays chess (the painful sword then buries itself deeply into their collective backs). 

Yes, I have sadly seen the misconceptions people have regarding the game I have come to love so much. I try to bring it up in interviews as much as possible because it in itself is a great learning tool regarding life. There is a large body of life lessons to be found within the 64 squares and the moves made on them. Like I said, cool people are people who are proud of who they are, regardless of what other people think. Chess players come in all flavors and colors. We come from different places and have different occupations, but the game of chess ties us all together.

We played a really big venue here in San Francisco, The great American Music Hall, which holds about 1000 people. The show sold out and our set went well. The highlight of my weekend:

SITTING ON THE COUCH WITH MY WIFE, DOG,CAT ANDTHECHESS BOARD SET UP FOR ME TO WORK OUT SOME CHESS PUZZLES. MAN, THAT'S AS GOOD AS IT GETS. Once again, chess wins the war as to whats best in my heart!

by Mominator - 15 months ago
Laguna Hills, CA United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 3

Erik,

I told you to NEVER use that old swimsuit photo of me on the web!

You never were very obedient. Just remember, I brought you into this world...and I can take you OUT!

Mom

by Scifi-boy - 15 months ago
Somerset, UK United Kingdom
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1

Oh C'mon, please - Miss out number 4 and you have my whole life story!  (and you can only rule that out as I'm 36 !!!)

If you look at other social groups they all attract  a certain 'type' and chess is no exception.

These 'sterotypes' do have an element of truth, not for everyone, but for lot of people.

by persemifflo - 15 months ago
Seville, AndalucĂ­a Spain
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1

It is certain that there are all kind of people who play chess, but if you take  100 football players and 100 chess players surely you'll find that the in the last group there is a bigger percentage that meet the "misconceptions" that are mentioned in the article.

I think it is a question of statistics. The good thing about chess is, like physical exercise on our body, influences on our brain positively with some  skills very useful for our everyday life.  

 

 

by chessiq - 15 months ago
Malawi
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 613

Nice piece! Nice illustrations!(especially #? sorry, poor memory and problem-solving skills Wink)

I have been made to believe that I am smarter that the average J. The other things change, sexy one day, not-so-sexy another day. Great memory one day, but bad memory another day. etc etc.

I lose graciously coz I am a winner!

Can you look at the avatars/pictures and see how many chess players are smiling?!? Nice! 

by beastspeaks - 15 months ago
dc United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1
Hahaha some are true and false. I'm a sexy nerd and proud of it.
by kindall - 15 months ago
Tennessee United States
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 9
I have been playing chess for a few months now, so maybe you could say that I haven't been playing long enough for these stereotypes to apply to me, but I have not ever won a game, and I'm okay with that.  I don't think I could be considered a sore loser because I keep coming back.  However, one could also argue that a competitive nature is what makes me keep trying...
by HymnofAshes - 15 months ago
Berkeley, CA United States
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 7
Look at ME! Loook at the GENIUS!
by Katrina - 15 months ago
Solihull, UK United Kingdom
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1
1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 are all true for me
by Georgen - 15 months ago
Houston TX United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1
i can't even beat the computer....
by shadowc - 15 months ago
Buenos Aires Argentina
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 468
That's right, but also, as I say in my blog article, it matters if you pay attention to it since when you are in your early states of your life.
by NoordZee - 15 months ago
Dandenongs, Australia Australia
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 76
I read with great interest the article about misconceptions about chess players.  In a way, this article comforted me somewhat.  I too was under the misapprehension that the masters and grandmasters of chess have superior intellect and memory.  I really think that most people would tend to get very good at "something" if they practise this "something" often enough.  You will find that most grandmasters of chess would have spent hours daily to get to their lofty levels. I, like most other 'ordinary' chess players have never had the inclination nor the time to devote my entire life to chess.  Yet I love this game and enjoy playing both face to face and on websites like this one.  Armed with this new perspective, I am going to beat my opponent in an interclub chess event tonight WinkMy poor memory has to be just as good as him or her.Smile
by farrellr - 15 months ago
Portland, Oregon United States
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 29

You're right, Erik, we all have our own style. I am giving you some feedback regarding this piece of your writing.(*) You can make use of it, or you can ignore it; it's up to you.

 

 

 

(*) If credentials matter, I have a BA and an MA in English from a state school and an MA in Literary and Cultural Theory from Carnegie Mellon University; before going into medicine, I worked for three years as a journalist and taught English composition for two.

by shadowc - 15 months ago
Buenos Aires Argentina
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 468

Well, now seriously, and trying to hide the fact that I lost one or two games here because I was busy saying hello to the newly joined cute girls instead of concentrating in my game (LOL), every man who practices a, let's say, complicated doctrine which involves performance, is going to have social disadvantages.

As for my piano playing experience, if you want to be a pianist, once you learned the technique, you have to be sat on a backless sit for at least five hours EVERY day so your muscles and tendons won't loose agility. If you do 3 hours one day, then it's 7 hours the next. Before you reach "certain" level, you can practice as much as 16 hours (I used to practice only 10) a day.

That leaves you very little time to experience social life, and despite the fact that you might be socially capable by your personality, the lack of practice will certainly be a drawback in that regard.

I am an extremely social person, I might say. But those hours alone with the instrument have turned me into a "not that popular guy"... you know... 

by tarabas333 - 15 months ago
Malaysia Malaysia
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 11

I'm a chess player... i'm smarter, socially adept, young and sexy... So What.....:)

 

by jona004 - 15 months ago
Telford, UK England
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 356
I like the bit about being socially adept. When i first joined a chess club, we would turn up most weeks and generally just play. After about six months someone mentioned that they hardly knew anyones names. He was right, nobody actually spoke to anyone to find out.
by erik - 15 months ago
Mountain View, CA United States
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 7113

thanks for your comments farrellr :)

as someone with a BA in English from a major university, let me say that there is nothing wrong with stylistic redundancy. that might your personal, unique, individual, self-held notion to one should never use superfluously excessive redudancies in YOUR writing, but i see nothing wrong with them :D. secondly, sterotype is NOT inherently a negative word. it is not a "politically correct" term, but stereotype, prejudice, and several other words suffer from an imposed negative association that is not deserved. sterotypes can certainly be legitimate.

as for the rest of your comments... who knows! it was an article meant to stir debate :) 

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.