The Modern Opening Way to Violate Old Rules

Submitted by GreenLaser on Sat, 06/21/2008 at 12:55pm.

In the following game the white pieces were commanded by Josif Dorfman. He was born in Ukraine in 1952 and tied for first in the Soviet Championship with Boris Gulko in 1977. They came ahead of the likes of Petrosian, Tal, and Polugaevsky. A playoff between Dorfman and Gulko resulted in a score of 3-3 which allowed them to both retain the title. Dorfman went on to second Garry Kasparov in four world championhip matches against Karpov. Dorfman moved to France where he coached a nine year old named Etienne Bacrot, who would become the world's youngest GM. The player of the dark side was Oleg Romanishin, who was also born in Ukraine in 1952. He  finished second in the Soviet Championship of 1975. He became known for a number of opening lines. The game between these formidable players starts with the Modern Opening, but never reaches into the middle game. Some of the general principles that beginners learn seem to be violated. Black develops bishops before knights and keeps the king in the center. White has doubled pawns. The result is like a heavyweight boxing championship fight in that when a mistake is made an early knockout can easily happen.


» posted in Opening Theory
 

Comments:

by NM GreenLaser - 2 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 808

srn347 wrote, "Moving a bishop before a knight doesn't break any rule(strategic, developmental, or otherwise)." No, it is legal and can be good to do. It does go against old generalizations that help us to learn chess. The Modern Defense itself does that to varying extents. Capablanca in "Chess Fundamentals," advised readers to develop the f1-bishop after moving a knight out, preferably the king's knight. He was not the first to suggest this. He was a grandmaster, which your home page claims for you. Doesn't that claim break some kind of rule, since FIDE does not list you as having any rating?

by srn347 - 2 months ago
California United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 229

Moving a bishop before a knight doesn't break any rule(strategic, developmental, or otherwise).

by Artemi - 4 months ago
Imus, Cavite Philippines
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 90
Instructive game! Blocking sacrifice to remove the defender!
by wharris - 4 months ago
Glasgow Scotland
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 11
Got to agree with GreenLaser. Nothing intrinsically wrong with castling into an open g file. It's common enough to castle and then open the g-file for a Rook once the King moves to the h file. That would have been White's plan when he played his 13th move. Tactically its a shocker, but everyone makes a lousy move now and then. Nice game.
by NM GreenLaser - 5 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 808
j3rry168, yes a GM made a mistake. The greatest players, including world champions, make mistakes. When such a player goes wrong against another, we often get to see the reason we call it a mistake. Weaker players don't always expose their opponents mistakes. White did not lose due to castling, but because of 13.Kh1.
by lapin - 5 months ago
Katerini Greece
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 1249
good game
by j3rry168 - 5 months ago
Sydney Australia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 15
What? Some kind of Soviet GM. No offence but even my 8 year old sister (who doesn't know how a knight moves knows not to castle into an open g file). He must have rushed the move i guess
by Masky - 5 months ago
Montreal Canada
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 80
awesome sac
by JF1 - 5 months ago
United Kingdom
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 142
nice game, cheers!
by gdadson - 5 months ago
Aliso Viejo United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 152

Wow... lesson learned!

 Thanks for the posting


 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.