Shabalov Flare

Submitted by Patzer24 on Mon, 08/11/2008 at 10:52am.

Here is a game from the 2008 US Open, GM Shabalov - FM Banawa with full annotations and commentary:





In this game we saw Shabalov play in his typical fashion, freely giving away pawns to get more active pieces, a lead in development, and most importantly preventing black from castling. Then soon after he was able to get a return on his investment (the sacrificed pawns) by winning a piece and soon after had a clearly winning position.

» posted in Amazing Games
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by donngerard - 3 months ago
Cebu Philippines
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 798

very nice game ...

thanks

by NM GreenLaser - 3 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 808

In the final position Black is dead lost. White has all the play. White will win the pawn on a2, but there is no rush. That gains a tempo on a7. Black can't play Nd5 because of Rxd5. If Qe7 or Kf8, to play Nd5, then Bxf6. White has Ne5 hitting g6 and d7. Black can't lose an exchange without being a rook down.

by Timark - 3 months ago
Northampton United Kingdom
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 26

I must say i have come through worse positions - i feel he resigned prematurely - much better going on too long than being premature

(Good advice in most things i should say)

by finamor - 3 months ago
Montreal Canada
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 10

It's difficult for me to see why Banawa resigned. I understand that he's down by one bishop and his king has not castle. But I thought that 4 more pawns could balance the game.

by RaZhaN-k - 3 months ago
suleymany Iraq
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1210

nice game by white!!

by thewolf72 - 3 months ago
Rome Italy
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 92

i hope one day ot this to became a very good chessplayer like this !

by NM GreenLaser - 3 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 808

EmTom wrote, "To all those guys telling us what black should have done: YOU SHOULD PLAY AGAINST GM AND SEE WHAT IT'S LIKE :)" Excuse me, I think you should question what "those guys" wrote, not who they are. I do not claim a select right to make suggestions because I have wins, draws, and losses against grandmasters. How would you know what experience "those guys" have?

by BirdBrain - 3 months ago
KY United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 814

Bringing back Danish flair!  Who needs pawns anyway?

by EmTom - 3 months ago
Lodz Poland
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 64

To all those guys telling us what black should have done: YOU SHOULD PLAY AGAINST GM AND SEE WHAT IT'S LIKE :)

by 4arms - 3 months ago
odessa United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 102

BLACK SHOUD OF PROTECTED his pawn

by TheChimp - 3 months ago
Chimp Jungle International
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 34

6...dxc4 looked terrible to me immediately.  I'm just a casual player, but I don't understand how this move could improve black's position.

by gnash68 - 3 months ago
Lamitan, Basilan Philippines
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 18

to Bowanza:

You mean ...Kd7?? to protect the rook.

This is not possible because White will capture the f7 pawn with check followed by capturing the f6 knight.

by NM GreenLaser - 3 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 808

bowanza, wrote"on move 13, ...Rf8 was not the only possible reply.  He could have played ...Kd2, correct?" You seem to mean Rg8 and Kd7. If 13...Kd7, the queen protects the rook, but nothing protects against 14.Qxf7+ Ne7 15.Ne5#.

by bowanza - 3 months ago
United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 267

on move 13, ...Rf8 was not the only possible reply.  He could have played ...Kd2, correct?

by NM GreenLaser - 3 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 808

There is only one Shabalov, but there are two Banawas. The FM is Joel. Here are some quick thoughts on the game:

6...dxc4?! cannot be played to hold the pawn. 6...Ne4, which does not give up the center, has to be better and offers a better way to simplify than 7...Bxd2?. 7...0-0 is better than Bxd2, even if 8.Nxc4. In the game, after 9.b3 Black could try to obstruct White dark-square bishop with b5 10.cxb4 b4 11.a3 a5 or 10.a4 a6 11.axb5 axb5 12.bxc4 b4. In the game after 12.Qg4, if f5 13.Qxg7 Qf6 14.Qxc7 looks bad, but  a move earlier 11...h6 12.Qxg7 Rh7! 13.Qf8+ Kd7 and the queen exchange may leave Black with too many pawns to lose, so White can try 14.Qc5. Later, instead of 14...Nd4!?, 14...Rg6 15.Qd2 (not 15.Qh4 Rg4 16.Qh6 Rg6 and probably never Qh3) Ne4 16.Qe3 f5 and Black is not out of danger, but has ideas Kf7/Ne7.

by ironchess - 3 months ago
Costa Rica
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 2

This line had been played before, pawn sacrifice included (check your database), actually it is so good for white, that one wonders why Black decided to play this variation in the first place! I found two games one played in 1991, the other one in 2001, since then nobody has tried this again.... until now!

On the other hand, I don´t like the look of Nc6, what does the knight do there for Black´s cause? Much more popular and very likely better is 4...b6 with the idea of Bb7.

The new move appears to be Black´s 9...cxb3, previously 9...Ne7 was played with very bad results. It´s funny that if you analyze this position with a program it would "say" white is somewhere between slightly to clearly better: another reason for not playing this as Black.

Is not my intention to belittle Shaba´s fine execution, but don´t you get the impression that Black was playing suicidal chess???

by CatoTheElder - 3 months ago
New Orleans United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 134

I really dislike black's play on

11. ...    Ne4

12. Qg4, Nf6

Complete waste of a very valuble tempo, black should have been able to anticipate Qg4.

by Patzer24 - 3 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 8557

Yes, I think 15...Nxf3+ is the best try for black although 16. Bxf3 white still has the better game with the more active pieces and safer King.

by nevin - 3 months ago
Tucson, Arizona United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 29

One question though, why did black not go with 15. Nxf3? it would have the same effect as taking the pawn.

by nevin - 3 months ago
Tucson, Arizona United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 29

i really love the way shabalov prevented black from castling. so useful!

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.