Frank Marshall's Greatest Tournament

Submitted by GreenLaser on Sun, 06/29/2008 at 1:15pm.

Cambridge Springs 1904 was an international tournament with 16 players. Eight were from Europe and eight were from America. Marshall was clear first with a score of 13-2 consisting of 11 wins, 4 draws, and no losses. A full two points back were David Janowsky and Emanuel Lasker, the world champion. The next best score by an American was turned in by Jackson Showalter with 8.5, good for clear 5th place. He had 4 wins, 9 draws, and 2 losses. In the elite "supergrandmaster" events lately, four or five wins is often enough to win, but in Showalter's case, he was not only way behind Marshall in wins, but came in first in draws. The great Harry Nelson Pillsbury, who triumphed at Hastings 1895, was already sick (he would die in 1906) and only tied for 8-9 with 7 points. Marshall credited his victory to how good he felt and his greater knowledge of the American players compared with his European rivals, who took the Americans too lightly. The following game was Marshall's last tournament game with Pillsbury.


» posted in Chess Players
 

Comments:

by aidenbowen - 4 months ago
victora Australia
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 88

yep i thought the same thing

 


by Kinan - 4 months ago
Kharkov Ukraine
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 17
Great game indeed..thanks for sharing GL.
by NM-or-bust - 4 months ago
Canada
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 98

Ah, thankfully pilsbury played to the forced mate to show it off, as the mates were beautiful indeed!  But what impressed me the most is the way marshalls instructive play, taking advantage of the f6 weakness.  I can never do that, I'm so stragetically weak Embarassed.


by Fellippo - 4 months ago
Zlín Czech Republic
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 490
Nice game about great player. Thanks!
by shakje - 4 months ago
Tyne and Wear, UK Scotland
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 185
A great example of mobilising all your pieces behind an attack. Most enjoyable :)
by Harry07 - 4 months ago
NSW Australia
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 615

Use of strong pieces a splendid game!Brilliant


by Artemi - 4 months ago
Imus, Cavite Philippines
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 90
Beautiful Attack! Marshall is a master!
by NM GreenLaser - 4 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 808
Pillsbury was dead lost. There was among players in earlier times a notion that resigning before checkmate was not nice. True, to take longer, Black could have played 22...fxg6, but then 23.Qe5 Nf7 24.Rxg6+ or 23.Rxg6+ Kf7 24.Qf3+ Nf5 both quickly win.
by lexieu123 - 4 months ago
Philippines
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 2

  I thought grandmasters can visualize 10 to 15 moves in advance.  This is not shown in this case.  Pillsbury had not seen that he would be checkmated when he took the rook in the 21st move.

 


by LDSSDL - 4 months ago
Tinton Falls United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 169
Marshall dictated the game. Very nice attack on the king. I love it when kingside attacks are successful.
 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.